Hello, Justus Winter, le Mon 05 May 2014 17:23:10 +0200, a écrit : > Just to make sure I got my idea across. With my change, a single > thread would service all requests to disk pagers, another one would > manage the requests to file pagers.
Sure. > And those requests are mostly > IO-bound, and as far as I understand it our IO layer cannot acommodate > concurrent operations. That is the current layer, yes, but I hope that the DDE or Rump layer for disks does have concurrent operation support. > If so, more threads does not mean getting more work done. As of now, yes, that's why I was mentioning using just one thread for now. Samuel
