Zhang Cong, le Mon 07 Apr 2014 19:36:02 +0800, a écrit : > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> > wrote: > > Samuel Thibault, le Mon 07 Apr 2014 11:31:33 +0200, a écrit : > > Zhang Cong, le Mon 07 Apr 2014 17:25:34 +0800, a écrit : > > > The one who do this need have the full plan, > > > > I don't see why one would need a full plan. > > Putting it another way, I don't think anybody has the full plan. Which > is fine, all medium-to-big projects are like that. > > Driver related idea may need a full plan:)
Again, no. Drivers can work the way they prefer. The driver infrastructure itself doesn't need a "bigplan", it is parts of it which need their own. For instance, the IRQ issue I mentioned has its plan by itself, and it doesn't need to interfere with the physical memory allocation issue. Samuel
