Marin Ramesa, le Sun 08 Dec 2013 12:40:26 +0100, a écrit :
> This wasn't noticed before since the number of cpus is always one I guess, but
> cpu_interrupt_to_db() is without definition. Comment the call.
Well, I prefer the issue to be noticed at compilation and thus spotted
immediately rather than by the stuff not working correctly, and the poor
hacker wondering why not...
> * ddb/db_mp.c (cpu_interrupt_to_db): Comment the call.
>
> ---
> ddb/db_mp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/ddb/db_mp.c b/ddb/db_mp.c
> index b99718e..1b1277e 100644
> --- a/ddb/db_mp.c
> +++ b/ddb/db_mp.c
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ remote_db() {
> machine_slot[i].is_cpu &&
> machine_slot[i].running)
> {
> - cpu_interrupt_to_db(i);
> + /*cpu_interrupt_to_db(i);*/
> }
> }
> }
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
>
--
Samuel
<P> je sens venir la fonte 14 pour le rapport
-+- #ens-mim -+-
