Marin Ramesa, le Sun 08 Dec 2013 12:40:23 +0100, a écrit :
> Value db_tok_string[0] can be used instead of c.
Ditto.
> * ddb/db_expr.c (db_mult_expr): Remove unnecessary variable.
>
> ---
> ddb/db_expr.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ddb/db_expr.c b/ddb/db_expr.c
> index eee9e4f..bd68f92 100644
> --- a/ddb/db_expr.c
> +++ b/ddb/db_expr.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,6 @@ db_mult_expr(valuep)
> {
> db_expr_t lhs, rhs;
> int t;
> - char c;
>
> if (!db_unary(&lhs))
> return (FALSE);
> @@ -190,9 +189,8 @@ db_mult_expr(valuep)
> t = db_read_token();
> while (t == tSTAR || t == tSLASH || t == tPCT || t == tHASH
> || t == tBIT_AND) {
> - c = db_tok_string[0];
> if (!db_term(&rhs)) {
> - db_printf("Expression syntax error after '%c'\n", c);
> + db_printf("Expression syntax error after '%c'\n",
> db_tok_string[0]);
> db_error(0);
> /*NOTREACHED*/
> }
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
>
--
Samuel
<macavity> bash: ls: Computer bought the farm
<macavity> THAT frightens ppl! :P
<macavity> id rather see: "bash: ls: Initialization of googol(AWAX)
disengaged in HYPER32/64 mode due to faulty page request at
AX:12A34F84B"
<macavity> at least that would give me the feeling that the
*programmers* knows what is going on :P
(lovely Hurd...)
