On 22.11.2013 19:08:53, Guillem Jover wrote: > I don't think it's appropriate to include stuff from the <i386at/*> > namespace from ddb/.
OK, but then we have an implicit declaration. I mean, it's not a big problem, just a warning.
- [PATCH 3/7] ddb: create new header file db_mp.h Marin Ramesa
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] ddb: create new header file db_mp.h Guillem Jover
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] ddb: create new header file db_mp... Marin Ramesa
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] ddb: create new header file db_mp... Samuel Thibault
- [PATCH 2/7] ddb: move forward declarations into a header f... Marin Ramesa
- [PATCH 5/7] ddb: move forward declarations into a header f... Marin Ramesa
- [PATCH 7/7] device: new header file chario.h Marin Ramesa
- [PATCH 4/7] ddb: move forward declaration into a header fi... Marin Ramesa
- [PATCH 6/7] ddb/db_examine.c: trivial stylistic fix for co... Marin Ramesa
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] ddb/db_mp.c: include kd.h for kdb_kintr() Guillem Jover
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] ddb/db_mp.c: include kd.h for kdb_kin... Marin Ramesa
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] ddb/db_mp.c: include kd.h for kdb... Samuel Thibault
