On 21.11.2013 18:58:28, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Marin Ramesa, le Thu 21 Nov 2013 18:56:09 +0100, a écrit :
> > On 21.11.2013 18:50:20, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Marin Ramesa, le Thu 21 Nov 2013 18:48:40 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > On 21.11.2013 18:19:52, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > > Marin Ramesa, le Thu 21 Nov 2013 13:11:08 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > > > - { "cs", (long *)&ddb_regs.cs,
> db_i386_reg_value
> > > },
> > > > > > + { "cs", (long *)&ddb_regs.cs, (void
> > > > *)db_i386_reg_value },
> > > > >
> > > > > Mmm, you shouldn't need this cast.
> > > >
> > > > GCC complains otherwise. I did not know what else to do.
> > >
> > > Well, show us the complain :)
> >
> > ../i386/i386/db_trace.c:60:2: warning: initialization from
> > incompatible pointer type
> > ../i386/i386/db_trace.c:60:2: warning: (near initialization for
> > „db_regs[0].fcn”)
>
> Mmm, you didn't modify the struct db_variable, so that's not
> surprising
> :)
It's used in other places. I think modification would break things.
