On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 02:22:51PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Well, then it can be done by something else than the proc server, it > does not really matter much. What matters is that we don't want to let > user tasks leak tasks without some control.
In my opinion, since tasks are kernel objects, task grouping should be done by the kernel too. For me, it looks like this issue is part of the more general problem of resource accounting in Mach. -- Richard Braun
