On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 11:41:51AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Mmm. It indeed looks odd to store the path at lookup. > > Concerning storing the path, it's a bit sad to have to do that, and > it'll become wrong if one moves the mount points. Another way would > be to make the client figure it out by itself from a port to the mount > point, much like glibc/sysdeps/mach/hurd/getcwd.c. It'll be slower, but > should be safer. The RPC would thus return an array of ports to the > mount points instead of an array of strings. > > Anybody else?
Looks better indeed. -- Richard Braun
