Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 09 May 2013 18:42:18 +0200, a écrit : > Then, to what extent are the proposed new RPCs just a specialized > variant of the generic "port info" RPC that we have been musing about, > <http://darnassus.sceen.net/~hurd-web/open_issues/translate_fd_or_port_to_file_name/>, > in particular the log from IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-03-07? To me it > would make sense to follow the latter route, so be able to store with > every generic port some bits of debugging/logging information
Indeed. > (perhaps literally, like the proposed 32 characters, or perhaps switch > to dynamically allocated upon setting the information and released > once the port itself is deallocated), Either would work, Barry could work on getting the static version working. > and that could then be tied to some new --enable-debugging configure > switch (or simply pinned to --enable-kdb), which, if not specified > will turn these into MIG_BAD_ID stubs. Which is fine too. Samuel
