Svante Signell, le Fri 15 Feb 2013 08:39:39 +0100, a écrit :
> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 00:31 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Fri 15 Feb 2013 00:18:16 +0100, a écrit :
> 
> > > > I don't understand what you mean.  What delay are you talking about?
> > > > The only delay in by branch is the delay requested by the user.
> > > 
> > > Well, with my code I need a timeout of 1ms for poll, with the old code I
> > > don't.
> > 
> > That 1ms is completely got ridden of by Richard's changes. I don't
> > understand what problem you are still seeing.
> 
> I know that Richards change solve the problem by moving the timeouts to
> the server.

Ok, so there is actually no problem.

Samuel

Reply via email to