Svante Signell, le Fri 15 Feb 2013 08:39:39 +0100, a écrit : > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 00:31 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le Fri 15 Feb 2013 00:18:16 +0100, a écrit : > > > > > I don't understand what you mean. What delay are you talking about? > > > > The only delay in by branch is the delay requested by the user. > > > > > > Well, with my code I need a timeout of 1ms for poll, with the old code I > > > don't. > > > > That 1ms is completely got ridden of by Richard's changes. I don't > > understand what problem you are still seeing. > > I know that Richards change solve the problem by moving the timeouts to > the server.
Ok, so there is actually no problem. Samuel