Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 00:12:57 +0100, a écrit : > On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 00:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 00:06:10 +0100, a écrit : > > > On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 00:03 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Svante Signell, le Tue 12 Feb 2013 23:55:04 +0100, a écrit : > > > > > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 23:50 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > > > Svante Signell, le Tue 12 Feb 2013 23:46:00 +0100, a écrit : > > > > > > > - some minor tweaks will still be made to be mor POSIX consistent. > > > > > > > > > > > > It'd be way better to keep these as separate patches. That's how > > > > > > we'll > > > > > > have to submit them to libc-alpha anyway... > > > > > > > > > > Is the description sufficient? > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > Do you want me to create intermediate versions (that will require an > > > > > effort and all of them have to be thoroughly tested) > > > > > > > > For the EPIPE/EIO/EBADFS error handling (which is essentially most of > > > > the patch), no. I'll rewrite that part completely, because your version > > > > has some issues > > > > > > which issues? > > > > As I said, it would take too much time to go through it. > > What a pity, I spent a very long time doing this rewrite, and to make > the code more readable (at least in my opinion).
Which probably allowed you to more easily work on it. > Back to spaghetti^Wold style code then. On the contrary, it's factorized style, not spaghetti. Samuel
