On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:01:03PM -0700, Thomas DiModica wrote: > Richard, if you wish to remove this optimization for the sake of clarity, be > my guest. I was just trying to be faithful to the working of the original > code.
I won't remove it for two reasons: first, it looks indeed faithful to the ctrheads version, and your explanations makes sense. Second, ufs is planned to be phased out as noone uses it. -- Richard Braun
