On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 01:55:42AM +0200, Sergio López wrote: > Nowadays, the copy strategy is decided per-object, but I think the > desired type of access to an object should also be considered. For > instance, the operation generated by vm_copy should almost always use > COPY_NONE, while vm_map, when doing things such as providing a private > map, should use COPY_DELAY.
I really don't see why vm_copy() should use COPY_NONE. Could you explain it briefly (sorry if I'm asking about something you may already have described, but I feel it would be better with a clear, simple, centralized explanation). -- Richard Braun
