Thomas Schmitt, le Tue 13 Sep 2011 13:01:45 +0200, a écrit : > Please ignore this sentence in my previous mail: > > > Where was this assigned to mach_port_array_t resp. to init_port_set ? > > It is a residue from obsoleted reasoning. I first found "^ array[]" > in gnumach/include/mach/mach.defs but later noticed that > device_set_status() itself has a variable length array. > > So my theory question is why strangely named type mach_msg_type_number_t > is used as counter for dev_status_t and other variable length arrays.
Overengineering^WNice type names, I'd say. Samuel
