Hi! On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:38:23 +0200, I wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:38:29 +0200, <olafbuddenha...@gmx.net> wrote: > > Also I just learned about debbugs.gnu.org, and would like to discuss > > whether we could use it instead of the atrocious Savannah tracker. > > In case this is discussed before I show up: I do agree (and in fact > thought about this before).
If we indeed go this route, which modus operandi would we want -- <http://debbugs.gnu.org/Using.html>: exclusive or non-exclusive? One suggestion: exclusive mode for bug-hurd. Everything that is sent there is turned into/appended to a bug report. And move over non-bug discussion to hurd-devel (which I still have not deleted) ;-), and make that one a regular mailing list (and get rid of hurd-devel-readers). Comments? For now, I'm keeping track of this issue on <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/web.git/tree/open_issues/issue_tracking.mdwn>; (bddebian.com is offline once again). You may also want to review yesterday's IRC discussion. Grüße, Thomas
pgpGL0rPj2iEl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
