Guillem Jover, le Tue 30 Aug 2011 02:43:03 +0200, a écrit : > If the original file has to be modified anyway to disable the function > I don't see the point in arbitrarily moving the function somewhere > else, more so when it forces the function to be global when it should > be static.
Right. > I'm following up with a revised version of the patch, which makes it > easier to track modifications to the original. Yes, it is better, I have applied it. Samuel
