Jérémie Koenig, le Wed 29 Jun 2011 23:17:49 +0000, a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Samuel Thibault > <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Jérémie Koenig, le Wed 29 Jun 2011 22:55:48 +0000, a écrit : > >> The old !SA_SIGINFO case was a non-standard (BSD-based?) extension. Is > >> there really anything using it? > > > > You can never know. And thus probably have to keep it. > > Would mapping the old values to the new ones in the trampoline code be > an acceptable compromise?
It is probably better than duplicating the mapping everywhere the values are generated, indeed > Should I rename the constants so that programs using them would fail > to compile, and therefore be noticed and, hopefully, updated to the > more portable SA_SIGINFO interface? I don't think so. We don't want to unnecessarily break something that can still work. > Would it still be ok to introduce POSIX sigcodes where 0 was used before? I'm not sure about it. I'd say when !SA_SIGINFO, better reset it to 0. Samuel
