Hi, On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 12:30:32AM +0100, Michael S. Walker wrote: > On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 19:41:28 +0200 <olafbuddenha...@gmx.net> wrote:
> > > * Support for XSLT transformations > > > > Not sure how that would fit?... > > It was an idea proposed in the TODO file, though that might be better > as a separate translator, as then you'd be able to alter > transformations simply by adding/removing translators, whereas that'd > be more tricky (I think) just doing it in xmlfs. So the idea is that one would launch an XSLT translator, with a XSLT style sheet as input, on top of an xmlfs directory, and the result would be a file representing the output of the XSLT processor? BTW, I fear that the scope of your proposal is a bit excessive. The summer tends to be over pretty quickly -- unless you are extremely fast, I don't think it's likely you will get past making xmlfs and perhaps unxmlfs fully functional... -antrik-
