Roland McGrath, le Mon 21 Feb 2011 16:42:23 -0800, a écrit : > ssize_t is for things that either return a size_t value or -1. > It's never used for parameters. I don't think a vm_ssize_t makes any sense. > > This is an odd way to use constructed the RPC interface for this, but we > already have it and perhaps there was some reason to do it that way. > You can just pass (vm_size_t) -1 as the value to indicate "no upper limit". > That should work automatically without any special effort on the server side.
So we need to change the RPC documentation to explicit "-1" instead of "negative", right? Samuel
