olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Fri 10 Sep 2010 02:31:25 +0200, a écrit : > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:03:28AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Samuel Thibault, le Wed 08 Sep 2010 12:01:12 +0200, a écrit : > > > > [...] but it seems odd to me to add an interface just for this small > > > part of information which you can fetch yourself for your own > > > processes. > > > > Or put another way, I'm really not at ease adding an RPC just for this > > kind of information, because later on we'll probably want some other > > information, and then another, etc. > > I'm not sure why you consider this a problem?...
Bloat. > *If* ten year down the road we indeed end up with half a dozen > miscallaneous info queries, we can *still* replace them by a new RPC > covering all of it... But still have to keep the old calls for old clients. > Also note that there is precedenct for extending the proc info query by > adding new RPCs. Ok, but I guess it wasn't just for _one_ piece information. Samuel
