Hi, On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:35:49PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> Again, it seems like a natural split to me. One translator per > filesystem: one to merge the different packages into a single > filesystem, and the other to interact with it. I really don't see any point in introducing an arbitrary process boundry here. It's not like you are actually splitting off any meaningful functionality -- the extra node would just be a proxy. The extra handling to set up that node would only add hassle to the user -- on top of a lot of additional hassle for the implementation. Better just handle it in the main process directly. -antrik-
