Hello! On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 07:58:57PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote: > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Da Zheng, le Fri 13 Nov 2009 16:38:34 +0800, a écrit : > >> Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > >>> Am Freitag, 13. November 2009 03:57:06 schrieb Da Zheng: > >>>> Anyway, the informal benchmarking shows us that the user-level pcnet32 > >>>> driver does have relatively good performance compared with the in-kernel > >>>> driver. > >>> That sounds great! > > > > /me joins the praise :)
Yes, this is really great news! > >>> Is your port already publicly available somewhere? > I guess it's better to have my own branches in the git repository because my > current code is quite messy. What I did is just to make the code work. > I think I had my own branch in the Hurd git repository, but I cannot find it > anywhere. Are all Hurd branches shown at > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/hurd.git/? I removed it from the Savannah repository at the moment that I had merged its content (your patch) into the master branch. > Can I have my own gnumach branch? So I can upload my modification of gnumach. Sure! For modifications on the existing Hurd or GNU Mach code base, just create a working branch for each of them. We had enough discussions over the last weeks with suggestions about how to name and handle such branches, so that I don't really care anymore how you're going to name them. (<http://www.bddebian.com:8888/~hurd-web/rules/source_repositories/> still has my suggestions on this topic.) For new packages (like the user-level driver itself, I suppose), I suggest to create a suitably-named branch in the incubator repository, <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/incubator.git/> -- how 'bout using user-level_pcnet32 for the branch's name? Please ask if you need any help. Regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
