Hi, Am Donnerstag, 12. November 2009 14:45:00 schrieb Thomas Schwinge: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:18:17PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 12. November 2009 12:57:22 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide: > > > -> http://www.bddebian.com/~hurd-web/hurd/status/ > > > > @Thomas: Can you write a note, once you pulled this into hurd.gnu.org? > > Done.
Many thanks! The comment is in: http://www.osnews.com/permalink?394278 > FVWM, and I also added Gnumeric to this description. Corrected :) > Actually the page *does* mention is, but see > <http://ikiwiki.info/bugs/img_vs_align/>. Who has the CSS foo? Anatoly? I see you already fiex it on bddebian - looks good, many thanks! > Strictly speaking, you don't need a real (hardware) X server running to > take such a picture, as there are also virtual (correct term?) X servers. You could also have a console ssh'ed to a Hurd box in your GNU/Linux X-Server - of even just fake the console :) But if people start with that, we can stop discussing, since nothing will make them happy (but everything will take our time :) ). > > @Samuel: Do you have contact with the fvwm people? If yes: Could you send > > them a link with the status page? > > I'd suggest to only do this if they have a page where they list > screenshots of FVWM in action. Otherwise this would be false news; false > in the sense of not being new. That's a good point... Am Donnerstag, 12. November 2009 14:45:12 schrieb Samuel Thibault: > I'd rather say: why telling fvwm people and not twm people, owm people, > foowm people, etc? Just because I happen to use fvwm for my desktop? :) They got lucky ;-) Best wishes, Arne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
