Michael Banck, le Thu 12 Nov 2009 14:18:27 +0100, a écrit : > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:20:37PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 12. November 2009 13:02:39 schrieb Michael Banck: > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:57:22PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > > > @Samuel: Do you have contact with the fvwm people? If yes: Could you > > > > send > > > > them a link with the status page? > > > > > > I don't think fvwm working is news. > > > > Nor interesting to the fvwm people that it runs on GNU/Hurd? > > Why would it be? AFAIK fvwm has no platform-specific code, so there is > no reason why it should not work. > > If it had to be ported, it got ported 10 years ago, so notifying them > now looks totally pointless to me.
I'd rather say: why telling fvwm people and not twm people, owm people, foowm people, etc? Just because I happen to use fvwm for my desktop? :) Samuel
