Hello, On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 12:13:30AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 05:15:30PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > Also, IIRC, the filter is expected to be run via symbolic links and > > extract the name of the translator to be filtered out from its command > > line arguments (I mean argv[0]); > > BTW, I concluded by now that it's probably nicer not to hard-code that > functionality in the filter itself, but rather use a simple wrapper that > does this...
Hm, I guess this is something we yet have to discuss. It would be great if we did this at the coming meeting. > > in this case the real name of the filter is not extremely important, > > since the final user will rarely use that name. > > Indeed. > > Still would be good to have something expressive :-) I have nothing against expressive names :-) Do you already have something on your mind? Regards, scolobb
