Hi, On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Gianluca Guida wrote:
> At the time, I was actually in favor of a separate stowfs which were > just using common code for unionfs, but politics and other rather > meaningless reasons brought it into the way it is now. Really? That's interesting -- I thought it was your idea to implement it in unionfs :-) Indeed I was always somewhat sceptical about this approach; I'd prefer seeing it in a distinct translator... -antrik-
