Hello, On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 07:11:47AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:17:15PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > The best situation would be if the file handle could be easily > > avoided, on which matter I cannot comment right away without a deeper > > investigation of nfsd. I think that avoiding file handles is worth > > the effort, but then I remember your words about a second level of > > directory structure to support NFS, which means that the effort might > > be pointless due to the fact that a file-handle-like structure is > > inherently necessary. > > Indeed, I don't think it's likely that it can be avoided -- or otherwise > it wouldn't have been added in the first place...
Maybe I should try to mail somebody who is more involved with nfsd matters than we are (like Thomas Bushnell)? Regards, scolobb
