Thomas Schwinge, le Sun 12 Apr 2009 17:32:12 +0200, a écrit : > __mach_port_destroy (__mach_task_self (), > thread->wakeupmsg.msgh_remote_port); > + > + thread->have_kernel_resources = 0; > }
Mmm, I do not like setting have_kernel_resources being set to 0 in pthread_thread_dealloc(), because pthread_thread_dealloc() does not destroy the kernel thread itself, it's the caller's matter. Yes it means putting it in a lot more places, but that'd be much cleaner & safer I think. Samuel
