Am Montag 08 Dezember 2008 13:37:14 schrieb Michal Suchanek: > However, a non-free application may require certain known version of > the otherwise free system (and driver for hardware cryptographic > device) to run or allow access to protected content.
This would mean that I as user could use the system only for a subset of the things the verifier could use it (even though that usage may only be added later), so that would be a severe usage restriction and very likely a GPLv3 violation if the driver were part of the GPLv3 system. If it isn't part of the operating system, I can replace it with a driver of my choice without disturbing my OS. Naturally you could ship a system which has an unfree driver which is restricted to verified versions by the TPM (only verified unfree drivers could access the TPM). That driver could however never link against any GPLv3 component, and no GPLv3 program could be restricted by it without violating the GPLv3. Best wishes, Arne -- -- My stuff: http://draketo.de - stories, songs, poems, programs and stuff :) -- Infinite Hands: http://infinite-hands.draketo.de - singing a part of the history of free software. -- Ein Würfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saubere (Rollenspiel-) Regeln. -- PGP/GnuPG: http://draketo.de/inhalt/ich/pubkey.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
