[EMAIL PROTECTED], le Fri 15 Aug 2008 02:26:29 +0200, a écrit : > > 2. In the file proc/version.c, the procps determines the version of > > Linux kernel to which the /proc belongs to and as I suppose it changes > > the way it reads the fields from /proc files vary. But on Hurd this > > version is returned as 0.3.0 which is in no way valid for procps. As > > of now I have Hard Coded it to 2.6.18, since the procfs I have written > > in most compatible with that version of Linux. So how do you suggest I > > patch it? Atleast here we need to differentiate between Hurd's version > > of procps and Linux's version of procps. How do I do it? > > I don't understand. What is the problem if you just have procfs return > 2.6.18?
The problem is that he didn't notice that there was a debian kfreebsd patch that makes procps use the value from /proc. The original code use uname. Samuel
