Hello!

On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 12:06:26PM +0200, I wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 03:52:28AM +0200, Stefan Siegl wrote:
> > A few last bits:
> > 
> >  -> where to import?
> >     I more and more arrive at the conclusion that we should just
> >     IPv6-enhance the existing pfinet, not add another pfinet6 directory
> >     which shares almost all the code.
> 
> I completely agree.

... and I also constitute you the coordination person for further pfinet
development.  Congratulations and have fun :-)!  Some people already
announced that they'd be interested in working on pfinet: Marco Gerards
and Richard Braun come to my mind immediatelly.  As you're the one to now
actually have worked on the pfinet code, you're the coordination person
for now.  This -- of course -- does not mean that nobody else would be
allowed to work on it anymore.


> >     IPv6 support can easily be disabled in config.h (and maybe some flag
> >     to the configure script somewhen)
> 
> Yes.

I thought about this once more.  Actually, I don't see any need for a
build-time option.  Have pfinet include the IPv6 code by default, but
only activate the IPv6 engine if IPv6 services are actually needed, i.e.,
if they are requested by the pfinet translator setting.  The increase in
the pfinet translator's executable size does not matter in my opinion.


Regards,
 Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Reply via email to