Hello all, In order to make the Hurd servers use syslog, i have set up a simple translator that can receive log messages and then call syslog on behalf of the sender. I have experimented with the proc "server" and it seems to be working. What do you think of this approach?
Another matter is what information needs to be syslog'd. IMO the more experienced hurd-ers already know what they need or would like to see syslog'd. Please do tell!! Filesystem logging is a separate issue that i haven't touched yet. I don't think it's optimal to send messages from the fs to my translator and then use the fs to write to the log! What if the fs crashes or malfunctions? Thats all for now! Thanks, Constantine _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
