Hello! On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 12:05:03AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: > ../sysdeps/generic/rtld-lowlevel.h:1:2: error: #error "Lowlevel > primitives for ld.so not implemented"
This is already reported at <http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3560>. > Should we have an rtld-lowlevel.h (I don't see one on any other archs), > or should we be implementing a sysdep dependent ldsodefs.h instead of > using generic/? The only `rtld-lowlevel.h' implementation I'm aware of is the `nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/rtld-lowlevel.h' one. So, yes, we need a non-nptl implementation. Whether this can then be generically usable or will rather be system-dependent and living inside `sysdeps/' has to be evaluated. Regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
