Hello! On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:31:34PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > I am skeptical that's a good idea.
Why? > Why not just add switches as desired to the script to provide a simpler > way to run it? e.g. mig --raw or suchlike. Hm. That seems a bit like a workaround to me. There are a lot of places where the `mig' shell script is only used as a wrapper for `migcom', like with the given ``$(MIG) -cc cat - /dev/null'' example. Regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
