Follow-up Comment #1, bug #18217 (project hurd):
Is the applied usage of `old_once' in line 2029 supported? For the Mach /
Hurd `__libc_once' functionality, we'd need to change that `if (old_once ...'
to `if (old_once.done ...', I think. Do we need a common interface for that
then, i.e. something like a macro `__libc_once_done(NAME)' which is defined
to `NAME.done' for Mach / Hurd and plainly `NAME' for NPTL and then use that
in line 2029?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?18217>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
