Hi, On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:51:12AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Barry deFreese, le Sat 28 Oct 2006 20:48:17 -0400, a écrit : > > The %p one is even a bit of a question. I believe %p is correct but > > I also dropped the 0x and maybe I shouldn't have? > > You shouldn't indeed. Some tools may depend on being able to parse > this.
The glibc version of printf automatically adds 0x (for non-zero values) when using %p. (i.e. it is equivalent to %#x.) Stesie's version doesn't seem to follow that, if I'm reading the code correctly... An issue that should be fixed, IMHO. -antrik- _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
