Follow-up Comment #4, patch #4818 (project hurd):
Hey Thomas, thanks for the followup.
I'll try to find some time to investigate this, doesn't seem to me such a
complicated issue tho. Anyways, I already have a faster substitute code for
the bitscanning stuff (which was legacy code).
Thanks,
Gianluca
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=4818>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
