Hi Bas, * Bas Wijnen wrote on Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:58:47AM CEST: > > In one of my projects, I use the nonrecursive approach, but I still have a > Makefile.am per directory.
Yes, it's a good idea to group things this way (by using included Makefile.am snippets) > Automake obviously isn't built to support it, but > it does work. If you're interested how it looks, check the Makefile.ams at > http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/svn/trunk/drivers/ (and its subdirectories). It supports it, but it does require you to use the full paths. Support for an `import' feature that would not require these paths was thought of at some point IIRC, but deemed very difficult to realize correctly. > There's one major hack in there: automake doesn't support += on things like > bin_PROGRAMS, so I had to create temporary variables for it and do > bin_PROGRAMS = $(programs). This sounds awfully like a bug in an old Automake version to me. Which one do you use? If older than 1.9.6, please update. > Also, in the included Makefile.ams you must > remember to always use the full path (from the toplevel Makefile.am). And > finally, my tree builds all the programs (and libraries) to top_builddir. > Check out the nobase_ prefix if you don't want that. Check out the Automake option subdir-objects, if you don't want that. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
