On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:22:42PM +0100, Gianluca Guida wrote: > I've recently been working on cleaning the drivers-related code.
I know. ;-) > [...] > This is bad IMHO, since device emulation is perfectly architecture > independant [...] Agreed. > [ legacy/ directory ] > And, furthermore, I moved > i386/i386at/i386at_ds_routines.c into device/ds_routines.c (they are > the REAL device server routines). That file includes <i386/linux/device-drivers.h>; shouldn't that file's source and the related stuff, i.e. the whole i386/linux/ directory as well be moved out of the architecture dependent i386/ directory, then? linux/ seems to be a good candidate for storing them. For my part, I always wondered why those device drivers should be i386-dependent. I can take care of that if you agree. > Here's the ChangeLog. If you want, I can provide you a tarball of the > tree I built. Yes, please do that. It'll be easier for me that way, I realized. :-) Regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
