Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG, le Tue 17 Jan 2006 00:46:49 -0800, a écrit : >> Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Currently, setsid(0) always return 1, while it should return the sid of >> > the calling process. Here is a proposed patch: >> >> I have no particular objection, but what is the standard that >> specifies its return value this way? >> >> Despite the suggestive name of setsid, there is no such thing in Posix >> as a "session id". > > It's an XSI extension: > > « The getsid() function shall obtain the process group ID of the > process that is the session leader of the process specified by pid. If > pid is (pid_t)0, it specifies the calling process. »
Oh, getsid certainly should do this. So is there a bug in setsid? Is there one in getsid? _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
