Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Anyone can be part of reviewing patches, and discussing design issues. >> The thing is about getting Tier One people convinced enough to get >> those patches in. > > This is a good argument for increasing the number of Tier One people > (a problem now under consideration), but not for abandoning the > separation entirely. Doing the latter would simply result in fewer > people with commit access at all.
After a long discussion several important issues have been discussed. Even promises have been made. I am curious about the following things: 1) When will Thomas Schwinge get CVS commit rights. 2) Who is in teer 1 now? 3) Who will get teer 1 access? Alfred? Thomas Schwinge? For me the last issue is the most important. It's unfortunate that it takes a long time before patches are committed. I personally prefer that patches that are perhaps less perfect will get committed instead of catching dust. Having for example Alfred's as the person who judges if a patch meets the required quality seems fine to me. Although I do not agree with his opinion all the time, he does know most technical issues required for that job. If not, I think we all end up using the ams-branch or letting the Hurd die. Thanks, Marco _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
