At Sat, 3 Sep 2005 02:25:18 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:49:50AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Hi! > > > > The attached `hurd_v.s._gcc-4.0.patch' makes the Hurd buildable with > > gcc-4.0. > > A fix (to be applied after the above patch) is attached: > `hurd_v.s._gcc-4.0.fixes.patch' > The patch only fixes my previous patch, so no new ChangeLog entry is > needed. > > Thanks to Neal Walfield and Peter De Schrijver. > > > Imo, a similar fix is also needed (additionally to those that Neal > already pointed out and Alfred fixed) for Alfred's patch to make glibc > build with gcc-4.0: > <URL:http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2005-08/msg00018.html> > #v+ > - *((integer_t *) t)++ = (integer_t) arg; > + *(integer_t *) t = (integer_t) arg; > + t += sizeof (integer_t); > #else > - *((integer_t *) p)++ = (integer_t) arg; > + *(integer_t *) p = (integer_t) arg; > + p += sizeof (integer_t); > #v- > ... should rather be... > #v+ > - *((integer_t *) t)++ = (integer_t) arg; > + *(integer_t *) t = (integer_t) arg; > + t = (mach_msg_type_t *) ((integer_t *) t + 1); > #else > - *((integer_t *) p)++ = (integer_t) arg; > + *(integer_t *) p = (integer_t) arg; > + p = (void *) ((integer_t *) p + 1); > #v- > > Correct?
This looks correct. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
