Why is this on both lists? At Tue, 01 Feb 2005 15:33:51 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ÐÐÐÐÐÐ ÐÐÐÐÐ) wrote: > Still, if it complained (not necessarily halted, a warning might be > enough: you wouldn't be annoyed by a warning indicating that you're > running your GNU/Linux system off a "Hurd" ext2 filesystem, would > you?), we wouldn't be having this discussion in the first place.
I agree with Alfred, it would be wrong. The OS type controls what type of os-specific extensions are enabled in the filesystem data structures, not what data is installed (what operating system etc). > > Infact, I often just format all my filesystems with "hurd" as the > > creator just so that I can use translators where I need them. > > You've got a point there, but I still disagree. Filesystems with > "hurd" for ostype are rare enough that if that happens, you're _most > probably_ doing something wrong. This is true, but we don't want it to be that way forever, do we? :) Thanks, Marcus _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
