Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now, you seem to have completely missed *my* point. "extern inline" > will change semantics sooner or later, and I would assume that "extern > __inline__" does too. If you can tell me that my assumption is false, > be my guest, but -ansi is not relevant here.
Why will extern inline change? I haven't seen anything in the gcc documentation to indicate any changes to extern inline. -- Thanks, Jim http://www.student.cs.uwaterloo.ca/~ja2morri/ http://phython.blogspot.com http://open.nit.ca/wiki/?page=jim _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
