On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 01:52:04PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:08:27PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > Ah, I found the problem. It's your miss. > > are you sure? now that i remember, Daniel Jacobowitz pointed out the same > before in this bug, but then he denied it: > > "Bug in the configure test. Include <resolv.h> before attempting to use > res_search; it's allowed to be a macro as far as I know." > [...] > "Bah, disregard my previous comment. It should be present." > > I'm CCing him. > > thanks!
According to glibc, #if SHLIB_COMPAT(libresolv, GLIBC_2_0, GLIBC_2_2) # undef res_mkquery # undef res_query # undef res_querydomain # undef res_search weak_alias (__res_mkquery, res_mkquery); weak_alias (__res_query, res_query); weak_alias (__res_querydomain, res_querydomain); weak_alias (__res_search, res_search); #endif i.e. "res_search" is only available if the oldest version of glibc for that platform was 2.0.x, I believe. Whether this is standards conforming or not you'll have to take up with someone who knows POSIX better. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
