On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 01:44:36AM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote: > > PING 192.168.1.4 (192.168.1.4): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=2.0 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=5.1 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=4.2 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=5.0 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=1.2 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=1.2 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=4.5 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=4.4 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=4.3 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=4.2 ms > > When I flood ping GNUmach2 I get 1% loss and no package loss with > GNUmach1. Maybe we can spur some interest in tuning these numbers > a bit?
It's hard to believe you get no package loss in GNU Mach 1. Do you flood the GNU/Hurd box from a GNU/Linux box? I have seen horrible package loss in that situation, which was much better with GNUMach v2. Thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/ _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
