"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The problem with having them still in the tree is that it's not obvious > > at a quick glance which tools are pieces aer still in use and worth > > learning when you're a new person. As an example, when James Morrison > > was doing patch reviews and sending a patch nearly every week a frequent > > response was "That code is never used". > > This is an excellent reason for looking at releases, rather than > leaving CVS as what we have instead of doing releases. > > You know that looking at the release of the Hurd (latest release is > 0.2, and was released in 1997 if I am correct) is quite useless. :-)
Which is why we should *do* releases, rather than leaving CVS as the non-official release. > Still, is the unused code somehow filtered out from the source tree > when a release is made? See hurd/Makefile. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
