Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Or, another possibility: that the place > to implement it depends on the exact semantics?
Could be. I think it would make sense to start by outlining the filesystem interface (rpc:s for listing old versions/deleted files, opening or recovering an older version (probably, linking it to a new name should be an optional part of the process?), hard deletion (which should not just unlink the file but also overwrite the appropriate bits on the underlying store) etc. When you have that, it will be easier to figure out where the code to implement itt belongs. "undelete" is a little fuzzy. /Niels _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
