Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I would encourage thought about just where netfs is inadequate (more > > broadly than this one issue) and think about a new library that works > > well for it--and for other localish things that aren't really netfs's > > area of expertise. > > netfs doesn't do a lot. a similar library addressing its inadequacies > might wind up being a perfectly fine library for nfs to use too, > and it doesn't much matter to me whether we call that netfs or something else. Sure. Perhaps we don't need a new library, and extending netfs to handle non-files is the right thing. I just don't like the kind of interface change that Marcus was looking for.
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
