Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But I was talking about a filesystem where it doesn't matter if there > is data loss in the case of a crash. For example, I wouldn't care if > the data of my glibc build is lost or corrupted. In that case we don't > need it and providing an option which turns it of would be nice.
And like I said, we could have a completely asynch mode for such cases--BSD has one, at least--there's nothing wrong with it. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd